It is important not to consider that a contract exists only at the time of execution of a document. The fulfilment of the essential elements of the contract and the proof of their material existence are more than sufficient to enforce the contractual conditions. It is therefore essential that these potential parties, at the preliminary stage of contracting, ensure that issues such as key terms, payment and a period are discussed or concluded only as part of a formal written agreement. Otherwise, the parties may indulge in a contract on unfavourable terms. Conversely, parties seeking a verbal agreement must take steps to document the existence of an oral agreement if the other party has decided not to comply with its obligations. An oral contract is a contract whose terms have been agreed upon by oral notification. This goes against a written contract, which is a written document. There may be written or physical evidence of an oral contract – for example, if the parties write what they have agreed – but the contract itself is not a written contract. Samuel Goldwyn said: « An oral contract is as good as the paper on which it is written » but this is often not the case. Indeed, the vast majority of transactions between individuals and between individuals and commercial enterprises are the execution of oral contracts. To learn more about oral contracts, you can publish your work on the UpCounsel website. UpCounsel lawyers have completed some of the best law schools in the nation and will guide you in making the best deal that protects your interests. Oral agreements can also be characterized as oral contracts; But this is a false statement.
Oral contracts include any contract, since all language contracts are false. On the contrary, an oral contract is a legal agreement that can eventually be applied by a judge. This was done by Delhi High Court, in the case of Nanak Builders and Investors Pvt. Ltd. vs. Vinod Kumar Alag AIR 1991 Delhi 315, the court having decided that even an oral agreement can be a valid and enforceable contract. Therefore, it is not strictly necessary, in the strict sense, for a contract to be entered into in writing, unless the parties themselves are considering reducing the terms of the contract. Oral contracts, if properly concluded in front of witnesses, can be applied. For example, in 1984, after Getty Oil was sold to Pennzoil as part of a legally binding handshake agreement under New York law, Texaco made a higher offer and the company was sold to Texaco. (Although the case was tried in Texas, new York law was in effect.) Pennzoil filed a complaint accusing of unlawful interference with the oral contract, which was upheld by the court and paid $11.1 billion in damages, then reduced to $9.1 billion (but was enhanced by interest and penalties).  Suppose Party A agrees to sell a $400 pound to Part B.
Part B accepts the agreement verbally and sends $400 to Part A.